Time for change
Mayor Arthur Babitz has done us all a
great service by explaining the cause of Hood River’s budget
problems. The city used the extra funds from the economic boom
of the 2000s to cover a decade-long deficit. But costs
continued to rise, particularly labor costs, and now with more
normalized revenues we face once again the chronic mismatch
between costs and revenues.
We are very fortunate that Mayor
Babitz does his research, because that is the start of a
long-term solution. The part of the solution we need to hear
now comes from the administrators who run the city’s
departments.
As of this date, the Hood River News
has reported pleas to save jobs and dire warnings that our
public safety will be jeopardized if we don’t maintain things
just like they are. This includes labor agreements with things
like 5 percent cost of living increases and health insurance
benefits for employee families — benefits everyone would like
to have but almost no one in the private sector gets anymore.
In a recent OPB interview, two local
entrepreneurs shared how they were working harder and changing
their business model to get through hard times, with the
belief that they would come out of this leaner and stronger.
This is the kind of effort we need from the city departments.
The City of Hood River has a
thoughtful council, a very smart and dedicated mayor, and
capable administrative staff. I want to believe that they are
capable of engineering innovative changes in how departments
are run and how much it costs to run them.
But the public and the local newspaper
needs to support this effort by giving them full moral support
to make the necessary changes, as deep as they need to go.
Mark Flaming
Hood River
Welcome voice
Levi Roeseler (Young Voices, June 3):
Thank you for asking questions and doing great research. Your
(essay) in the Hood River News needs to be seen by the world
environmentalists — maybe on the Internet. Environmentalists
everywhere need to see your research and not blindly follow
the pied pipers in this country.
P.S. I hope you got an A for your
essay.
Paul Nevin
Hood River
Soul-ful thanks
Soul Cafe would like to thank everyone
who made our Cajun Boil a big success on May 30.
The event would not have been possible
without the sponsorship of Chad Peterson and Todd Swan of
Columbia River Associates for Thrivent Financial.
The music of The White Salmon Jazz
Band and Pennies and Small Change provided a perfect
background to the great food prepared by volunteers Dan
Troglin and Chip Pierson. We are fortunate to have such gifted
musicians in the Gorge!
The facilities at Toll Bridge Park
provided a beautiful setting for the evening. Thanks also to
Larry Visser and youth volunteers Stephanie Harris and Mandy
Redmond for their assistance.
The funds raised will be put to good
use supporting youth activities and Sunday Suppers at Soul
Cafe. Thanks to all who attended!
Debby Chenoweth
and Perry Cole
Hood River
Tax ideas
Concerning the proposed county gas tax
and its need, I have some comments and suggestions to make:
I live in Hood River and am opposed to
a gas tax. It is a sales tax on gas.
Our firemen, policemen, sheriffs, city
and county workers deserve our deep gratitude and thanks for
jobs well done! We need to keep as many as possible!
There are probably greater reduction
and wiser spending of funds than we are doing now. I suggest
the following:
A. For those county/city people who
are willing to reduce their income by 5 percent, I say, “Thank
you!” In addition to these people, I think that ALL people who
are paid by city/county taxes should have their income reduced
by 5 percent, too.
B. I think that significantly further
savings and wiser spending could be obtained by following the
findings and recommendations of an independent Citizen’s Audit
Committee. Practical and useful advice on how to start such a
committee and how it could function is found on the Internet
Web site.
A booklet is available there: “How to
Reduce Property Taxes With a Citizen’s Audit Committee,” by
Dr. Armand A. Fusco with Dr. Lewis M. Andrews. It talks about
property taxes, but could be helpful for reduction in other
taxes, too. As you see, the authors make some sensible and
useful suggestions. Thank you.
Don Rose
Hood River
Support Pooles
We are fortunate that farming
accidents are not common in Hood River, but when they do
occur, the results are frightening and life-changing.
Last month one of our local
orchardists was involved in such an accident and I have since
heard of many “near” misses from other growers.
The farming community has rallied in
support of Don Poole and his family and on Saturday, June 6,
all local residents have the opportunity to participate in a
fundraising function.
The event will be held at The Gorge
White House on Highway 35 and starts at 6 p.m. I would
encourage you to attend this event and generously assist Don
in his long and expensive recovery.
Jean Godfrey
Executive director
Columbia Gorge
Fruit Growers
ANOTHER VOICE
By PETER CORNELISON
Renewable energy development is
important to fulfilling our future energy needs and reducing
greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global warming.
Unfortunately, the Whistling Ridge
wind turbine project proposed by SDS Lumber Company in eastern
Skamania County is a poorly planned project that would result
in adverse impacts to forest land, wildlife habitat, birds,
scenic resources and nearby property owners.
Large wind energy developments on an
industrial scale have the potential to harm wildlife habitat,
kill many birds and bats, mar scenic vistas, destroy forests
and impact the quality of life of surrounding property owners.
Just like any large-scale industrial use, it is critical to
plan these projects to avoid harm to other resources and to
continue the public support for renewable energy development.
The Whistling Ridge proposal involves
up to 80 turbines; each unit is 426 feet tall, placed on a
forested ridgeline along the boundary of the National Scenic
Area near Underwood Mountain. The project is proposed within a
state-designated “Northern Spotted Owl Special Emphasis Area.”
Approximately hundreds of acres of
forested habitat would be denuded, resulting in permanent
habitat loss for many forest-dependent species including the
northern goshawk and northern spotted owl, listed as
“threatened” under state and federal law. The area will be
transformed from a coniferous forest environment to an
industrial landscape.
It is well-known that poorly planned
wind energy projects can result in thousands of bird
fatalities. For example, monitoring data from the Big Horn
wind energy project in Klickitat County has revealed that bird
mortality from this project far exceeds the initial estimates,
with up to 16 times more raptor fatalities than expected.
A total of 704 birds, 446 bats and 49
raptors are killed per year. That is why it is so important to
avoid important bird areas and migratory flight paths when
siting these projects.
The scenic impacts of the Whistling
Ridge project would be enormous. The southern half of the
project would be visible for miles up and down the Gorge. Its
400-foot-tall turbines and flashing warning lights along the
Gorge’s northern ridgeline would be a constant reminder of
industrial development intruding into natural forest habitat.
Members of the public can learn more
about this topic by visiting one of the following Web sites:
www.EFSEC.wa.gov
www.saveourscenicarea.org
www.gorgefriends.org
You can also contact me at:
peter@gorgefriends.org
for more information on how to get involved.
n
Peter Cornelison works for Friends
of the Columbia Gorge in the Hood River office.