Local ‘Crossfire’
Crossfire — with Matt and Cliff!
With Cliff (Mansfield) guarding the
right and Matt (Rankin) on the left — you’ll have all sides of
the issue. Cliff can condescend and insult — and Matt can
ridicule and brow-beat.
Cliff can buy a new hand gun and Matt
can copy down the serial numbers.
Matt can testify about air quality and
Cliff can go light a bonfire.
Allegations will fly, there’s talk of
an affair, Cuban cigars and some backdated stocks — really,
this story has a long ways to go. Why stop now — keep those
opinions coming.
Dallas Fridley
Hood River
Way to learn
Regarding Matt Rankin’s response
(April 11) to the plethora of letters by Cliff Mansfield, I
appreciate Cliff’s approach to anyone not a far-right
Republican. His articulate opinion opposes mine completely;
however, this only affirms my long-held doctrine of being a
tax-paying, hardworking small business owner and teacher.
His diligence to the far-right mass
media message only incites further need for others to seek the
facts and state the truth.
For opportunities in our community to
educate yourself on peace and justice issues, contact
www.columbiariverpeace.org.
Trish Leighton
Hood River
Sword verse
After reading Tom Yates’ letter (Hood
River News April 8) I have to say that I agree with him that
the root cause of so much violence is, in fact, sin. I also
agree that Jesus has paid the price for all our sins and
through Him we have a counter to our sin nature. But the
article was also about gun control. While the misuse of guns
is a very troublesome plight on our society, guns are not the
problem.
So let’s look at this from a biblical
perspective. The weapon of choice 2,000 years ago was the
sword. The Romans used a short (about 16-inch) sword. It was
both an offensive and a defensive weapon. The Roman soldiers
kept their swords very sharp and were well-schooled in its
use.
A few days before Jesus was to be
given up to the Romans to be executed, He gathered up his
group of followers and asked them. “When I sent you without
purse, bag, or sandals, did you lack anything?” They replied
that they had lacked nothing. Then Jesus said, “But now if you
have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a
sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”
So the problem is not with the weapon,
it is with sin. Not only do I have my Second Amendment
American right to have a weapon, I also have the blessings of
Jesus to protect myself, my loved ones, and my property. I
didn’t make this up. It’s in the Bible, the 22nd chapter of
Luke, verse 36. Look it up.
Mike Farmer
Hood River
What’s bigotry?
Bigotry speaks in many different ways
and under many guises. A recent letter supports this idea.
Some believe all members of the Democratic party “will always
want to eliminate (your) gun rights.” Also, that members of
the Republican party, in order to protect themselves from the
“stupidity (of the Democrats)” MUST ban together to protect
their right to bear arms as the U.S.Constitution permits.
It would appear you cannot be a true
member of the Republican party if you are not also a
gun-carrying, outspoken, proud member of the NRA? Many may not
remember the act which was a major impetus for the Brady Bill.
James Brady was a member of the Reagan cabinet who was shot
while preventing the assassination of a U.S. president.
President Reagan was a Republican, so
I expect Mr. Brady was as well. Despite their political
affiliations, both President Reagan and Mr. Brady were key
players in the establishment of the Brady Bill. I suspect
these men chose public safety, common sense and intellect over
emotion when deciding how to establish a bill which puts
restrictions on gun purchases and ownership.
I wonder how many friends and
relatives of James Brady are “gun haters” today? Using bigotry
to pigeon-hole groups into ALWAYS and NEVER categories
invalidates the freedom of choice of the groups in question.
It certainly cannot hide the thinly-veiled vendetta against
our current president and administration.
I continue to enjoy all readers’
opinions in the paper. I particularly enjoy the writings of
those who stick to topic and use facts to strengthen their
arguments. These facts allow all of us to expand our thought
processes and step out of comfortable paradigms.
Steve Kaplan
Hood River
Good businesses
I would like to recognize three
exceptional businesses in Hood River that set themselves apart
from the others with exceptional customer service.
Particularly in these trying economic times, customer service
is key to a successful business. It seems a lot of businesses
here in Hood River take my business, and the business of my
peers for granted.
There are several stores that include
a board shop, cafes and restaurants here in town that I simply
refuse to patronize because of their blatant lack of effort in
the customer service area. These businesses are missing out on
a great deal of revenue from myself and others due to their
complete ignorance of how to treat a paying customer.
That said, the three businesses that
really keep me coming back because it seems they actually care
about service and my business are Silverado Jewelry (others
should take lessons from this business on how to treat a
customer), Brian’s Pourhouse (always a great dining
experience), and DelCarpine Automotive (who sometimes make me
feel like I am their only customer!).
If you want your car fixed right
without getting taken to the cleaners, DelCarpine is the
place. Businesses take heed, our economy is dragging us all
down, but it doesn’t have to take you out if you take good
care of your customers.
Peter Talmage
Hood River
Hearing date
I am a little confused by Gennaro
Avolio’s response to my airport letter on April 11.
He said that I should take my own
advice and attend the hearing. When did I say I wasn’t going?
Of course I will be at the hearing! I wouldn’t suggest others
go and not attend myself! I never suggested that the Port had
plans to “extend” the runway, but now that you bring it up,
why close Orchard Road if you are not going to extend the
runways?
I don’t remember in the last 30 years
that I have lived here that a plane has run off the runway and
over Orchard Road. In the couple of years you have been here,
can you remember it?
I agree with you that the citizens of
Hood River should have an airport; that was never the
question. We just don’t need a high-roller type airport. If
you need to land larger planes, go to Dallesport! Enterprise
Car Rental will be more than glad to pick you up!
Let us not cater to those with the big
toys! Rather, let us focus on usage for the whole population
of Hood River County.
Geoff Moore
Hood River
ANOTHER VOICE
By MICHAEL McELWEE
Executive Director. Port of Hood
River
Wednesday evening, the Hood River
County Planning Commission will consider the long-term plan
for the Ken Jernstedt Airfield. Anyone with an interest in the
airport is encouraged to attend the April 22 hearing, to learn
more about future projects for the airport and to express
their views. Here’s a perspective from the Port of Hood River.
Background – The airport has
been owned and operated by the Port since 1976. It is home for
about 100 local planes. On an operating basis, the airport
just about breaks even with income from leases and aviation
activity. While the airport serves as a visible base for fire
and search & rescue operations, it is also a vital resource
for pilot training, general education, aircraft maintenance
and local jobs. Recently, it has become a nationally
recognized focus for historic aircraft through the Western
Antique Aeroplane and Automobile Museum.
Oversight of the airport is by the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The FAA provides annual
funding of approximately $150,000 for projects listed on a
master plan’s main planning document, known as the Airport
Layout Plan. The FAA approved the ALP in 2005. However, it has
never been reviewed for possible adoption into Hood River
County’s Transportation Systems Plan. Last year the Port
Commission directed staff to seek County review to ensure that
the FAA-approved plan is consistent with local transportation
goals.
Future Plans – The ALP,
developed through public input and recommendations from the
Port’s Airport Advisory Committee, describes capital projects
expected over the next 20 years. The most significant of these
is shifting the runway 550 feet eastward to increase the
safety setback from Tucker Road.
This shift would not lengthen the
runway, and a runway extension is not part of this plan.
Relocating the runway will not lead to bigger planes,
significantly more aircraft landings or additional aviation
noise. It would increase the safety setback from Tucker Road
to reduce the possibility of aircraft/ground vehicle
accidents.
Other projects in the ALP include
relocating the parallel northern taxiway to provide greater
distance from the runway, expanding the area for aircraft
tiedowns and relocating the airport operations building to the
north side of the airfield so it is adjacent to the taxiway.
All of these projects would improve safety and increase the
likelihood that the airport will remain functional and vital
over the long term.
Key Issues – The most
significant ALP issue is the proposed runway shift. Orchard
Road would need to be vacated immediately east the airfield.
Although this is not preferred, it is essential to enhance
airfield safety. If it cannot occur, the current runway
location would remain with increasing safety concerns on both
Tucker Road and Orchard Road.
The ALP, if adopted by the county,
removes the possibility of the airport obtaining an instrument
rating, which is a challenge because of the area’s topography,
and reduces FAA-imposed limitations on development surrounding
the airport. An instrument approach would have land-use
consequences up to two miles away from the airfield. The
approach status would remain visual, which has always been in
place at Ken Jernstedt Airfield.
Other issues include moving the
existing taxiway a bit farther north, and, as mentioned above,
relocating the airport operations building to the north side,
a move which will decrease the number of aircraft that
currently cross the active runway for fueling services on the
airport’s south side.
Ken Jernstedt Airfield has a long
legacy and is a vital part of this community. It provides
obvious benefits for pilots and airport users. Others can
recognize that the airport adds a measure of community
richness, history, agricultural support and economic benefits
that serve all of us. The airport is an important part of our
transportation infrastructure and must be thoughtfully
protected and planned to secure its future. The Port
Commission believes the proposed master plan will do this.