OMG! Funny
(That is the only text language I know
as I am over 55). I laughed so hard reading the article by
Anne Vance (March 7).
So many truths; I went one step
farther with my phone and had the thing disconnected! I do
call my 13-year-old granddaughter to figure out how to use my
cell phone. My fingers are too big and can’t seem to only hit
one number at a time; that is, if I put my glasses on so I can
read the numbers.
Oh well, thanks for getting those
views out there; it adds humor to our lives in a time where we
need all the laughs we can get.
Jan Wallace
Mt. Hood
Spiritual peace
I read Kristy Sargent’s letter (May
11) this morning with sorrow.
Death of loved ones challenges all of
us in different ways. I was also saddened as I read your
letter because it inferred you hold anger and other strong
emotions related to death.
Many cultures, both in our own country
as well as outside, share very different views about life,
death and the transition between the two. You can look at the
New Orleans culture, where music and a celebratory walk
sometimes honors the dead and the joy they brought to the
mourners’ lives.
There is a common theme surrounding
the transition to death shared by many cultures and faiths
around the world. The commonality is a preparatory process to
ease the soul into the next place with a sense of comfort and
readiness.
I believe this is the purpose of
services such as hospice and other healing arts. Tragic and
traumatic deaths do not permit the aforementioned preparation
to occur. I still support the notion that peace of mind, body
and soul aids the transitional process for both the deceased
and the survivors.
I would encourage anyone struggling
with the issues of death and illness to use any resources
available to them. These would include local physicians,
clergy, hospice services and support groups, among others.
Peace to you, Ms. Sargent, and others
with similar struggles about death and the inequities of life.
Steve Kaplan
Hood River
Help stop abuse
Three articles in a single issue of
the Hood River News (March 7) described disturbing family
violence and abuse involving children.
While we actually saw a decline in
child abuse and neglect rates in Hood River County last year,
stories like these have recently surfaced. Deputy District
Attorney Carrie Rasmussen was astute to note that “the
economic recession could be creating an added level of stress
in many troubled households.”
It is well-documented that multiple
family stressors put children at greater risk of being abused
or neglected. As we observe our neighbors struggle with
finances, strained relationships, single parenting, and drug
or alcohol abuse, we need to watch out for our community’s
vulnerable children.
Be a friend to a parent you know —
offer to help with the kids or run an errand.
Be a friend to a child you know — take
a special interest and show them you care.
Support local programs that help
vulnerable families, such as New Parent Services’ Healthy
Start program, Court Appointed Special Advocates, Head Start,
Helping Hands Against Violence, Big Brothers Big Sisters, and
the Commission on Children and Families.
Remind your legislators that we need
to keep these programs funded.
Know that anything you do as an
individual, and anything we do as a community to support
families will reduce the stress that can lead to abuse and
neglect.
Karen Enns, program
director, New Parent Services
The Next Door
Barrels of pork
Rep. Greg Walden and the Party of NO!
I am appalled at the hypocrisy of the Republicans and the 2009
Budget Act just passed that was “loaded with pork.“
If you review Rep. Walden’s Earmark
Requests listing, aka “pork,“ the list is around $260 million.
And yet, he voted against the pork-laden budget. However, he
will surely take credit for the “pork projects funding we
Oregonians will receive” in the budget that President Obama
just signed into law.
Rush Limbaugh is right; all
Republicans should just vote no as they are doing in lock
step. Rep. Walden does not represent my centrist views.
Dale Nicol
Hood River
Save sea lions
In Baja, you can swim with these
curious, playful mammals. In Oregon and Washington they kill
them. I am appalled at the plan to shoot 85 California sea
lions at Bonneville Dam each year for the next five years.
The Environmental Assessment is that
the sea lions eat from .4 to 4 percent of the spring salmon,
which the ODFW considers to be a “significant impact” on
salmon recovery, while the fishermen are allowed 13 percent,
considered an “insignificant impact.”
The dams alone kill 10 percent of the
adult fish. It is obvious that the sea lions are being
unjustly scapegoated by government agencies; the real threats
to salmon populations are caused by humans — over-fishing,
dams and habitat destruction.
Killing sea lions does not address
these core problems; our money is better spent on conservation
strategies. Columbia River cruising has been a $50
million-per-year business, bringing people from all over the
world to see the wildlife and natural beauty of the Gorge.
I can imagine a cruise ship plowing
its way up the river through a maze of fishing boats and the
cruise director saying, as they pass through the Bonneville
lock, “and over here you can see the sharp shooters killing
the ‘federally protected’ sea lions.”
Melba Gohl, owner,
Adventure Cruises
White Salmon, Wash.
Most wanted
Every few years an article shows up
that I can’t believe. Last week’s gem was the parking violator
article and all the tough talk about enforcement. Given the
serious tone I thought “America’s Most Wanted” was filming in
Hood River.
In perfect contrast was the great
article a few pages later which depicted the reality of the
Guantanamo parking gauntlet in town where the senior citizen
dropping off donations for the needy was busted for her
parking.
This week’s news should be that there
is no big conspiracy of parking spot thugs who thrive on
getting a few free minutes on the back of the City. The real
criminals are all of us parents, seniors and others who wanted
to throw a few dollars at our downtown and simply lost track
of time.
Ron Reynier
Underwood, Wash.
ANOTHER VOICE
By DARYN FOGLE
No Interest. No Payments.
No More.
Have you ever been in the situation of a household appliance
failing at a time which was just not financially convenient?
Most of us have. You would go to your
local store, purchase the item needed; and if you qualified
for store credit, you took advantage of the store’s “no
interest, no payments for 12 months” offer. Man, did that
soften the unexpected blow of a major purchase. Many of us
consumers are already feeling the effects of our slumping
economy and need financing options for purchasing big-ticket
items, not just appliances.
So why am I writing this today? On
Dec. 28, 2008, the Federal Reserve System (Fed) published new
regulations intended to improve disclosures in connection with
credit card accounts. There are two new regulations within the
many which will affect us all.
One is issued under the Fed’s
authority to enforce the Federal Trade Commission Act
prohibiting unfair and deceptive acts and practices; the other
implements the Truth in Lending Act provisions related to
disclosure of credit terms and costs originally enacted as
part of the Consumer Credit Protection Act of 1968 (Reg. Z).
Included in these regulations are
provisions which ban deferred-interest financing such as “0
percent promotions” offered by many local retailers today. The
FED had previously sought input from retailers on the
disclosures related to such offers, but in the end banned them
altogether!
The new regulations go into effect on
July 1, 2010, but could directly affect offers that expire
after July 1, 2010.
In essence, as early as June 1, 2009,
this will impact your ability to obtain such financing!
Without options like deferred-interest financing, many
Americans could be forced to pay a great deal more in interest
payments, pay cash, or go without altogether.
In my opinion we should be encouraging
consumers to spend money (within their means) to stimulate the
economy by making it easier for them to purchase products; not
putting up roadblocks.
Weak sales and one of the worst
holiday seasons in decades has already resulted in widespread
job loss and store closures. Lack of promotional options on
expensive products will only exacerbate this shopping trend
and force retailers to consider more layoffs in a time when
jobs are sorely needed.
I believe this ban by the Fed is a
knee-jerk reaction to the housing market/financing debacle,
and it is a misdirected attempt to save consumers from
themselves. The fear the Fed has is that the general public
does not understand the terms of paying back the loan on a
“no-interest, no-payment” structure.
So let’s eliminate it and let the
consumers suffer with the new regulations is the final result.
The elimination of these promotional offers could result in
further sales declines which could put the viability of many
local retailers and those across the nation in question.
Please call, write, or fax Rep. Greg
Walden or Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley with your
concerns regarding this vital issue. Their mailing and e-mail
addresses, phone and fax numbers can be found on this page of
the paper.
n
Daryn Fogle and his wife, Sue, own
Sears Hometown Store in Hood River.